Volltext-Downloads (blau) und Frontdoor-Views (grau)

Contextual determinants of intimate partner violence: a multi-level analysis in six European cities

  • Objectives: To assess whether city-level characteristics influence the risk of intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization across six European cities. Methods: The DOVE study included 3496 participants from Athens-Greece, Budapest-Hungary, London-UK, Östersund-Sweden, Porto-Portugal and Stuttgart-Germany. IPV victimization was assessed using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and several contextual variables were included: GINI coefficient, gender equality index, an index of social support, unemployment rate and proportion of residents with tertiary education. Multilevel models were fitted to estimate the associations (odds ratio, 95% confidence intervals) between each type of victimization and contextual and individual-level variables. Results: 62.3% of the participants reported being a victim of IPV during the previous year, with large between-city differences (53.9%-72.4%). Contextual variables accounted for a substantial amount of this heterogeneity. Unemployment rates were associated with psychological (1.05, 1.01-1.08) and physical IPV (1.07, 1.01-1.13). GINI coefficient showed a positive association with any form of IPV (1.06, 1.01-1.11) and sexual coercion (1.13, 1.01-1.25). Conclusions: We found significant associations between contextual determinants and IPV, which emphasizes the importance of considering contextual socioeconomic conditions when policy measures are designed to address IPV.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar

Statistics

frontdoor_oas
Metadaten
Author:Jutta LindertORCiD, Nicole Geovana Dias, Silvia Fraga, Joaquim Soares, Eleni Hatzidimitriadou
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01516-x
Parent Title (English):International Journal of Public health
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Year of Completion:2020
Release Date:2025/01/20
Tag:Inequalities; Intimate partner violence; Social support; Socioeconomic factors
Volume:65
Issue:9
First Page:1669
Last Page:1679
Institute:Fachbereich Soziale Arbeit und Gesundheit
Research Focus Area:Ressourcenorientierung im Spannungsfeld von Individuum und Gesellschaft (ROSIG)